Best made in USA running and walking shoes

by Solereview editors

Best made in USA running and walking shoes

This article has been updated with current models for May 2021. The New Balance Postal 706V2 is a new addition. The New Balance 1300 has been removed.

We should just add a ‘New Balance’ prefix to the title of this piece. Because that’s exactly what this guide has turned into.

Until recently, adidas occupied one of the slots on this list. That was thanks to its now-defunct ‘Speedfactory’, a rapid manufacturing experiment that ran in Germany and Georgia, USA.

It’s still possible to find the adidas AM4 on StockX or eBay, but New Balance is the only brand that sells ‘Made in the US’ running shoes as a part of its permanent collection. Sort of. Because most of the models that feature here are retro running shoes that are heavy and sold in drab colors and materials. Except for the Postal 706V2, that is. It is a walking shoe, but since there were limited choices from the running assortment, the more the merrier.

Even so, New Balance makes only a small percentage of their total footwear production stateside. Barring a small number of shoes made in the UK and US, the rest are manufactured in Asia.

It helps that New Balance isn’t a listed company. This gives it leeway to do things that would otherwise be frowned upon by public market investors.

There’s another reason why manufacturing in the US suits New Balance’s overall plans well. In our 2014 review of the 1260V4, we discussed the possibility of New Balance supplying made-in-USA shoes to the military based on the Berry Amendment.

And guess what – the Department of Defense awarded New Balance a $17.3 million contract in 2018 to supply shoes to recruits.

We’re not saying that the contract is the reason behind New Balance’s US manufacturing facility, but it turned out to be pretty convenient. The Postal 706V2 is another example of large-scale institutional orders helping New Balance’s stateside manufacturing.

Given how small and high-priced New Balance’s US collection is, it doesn’t make business sense. But it is certainly excellent PR – and any brand could do with that, particularly in this current economic climate.

Nike’s sourcing was based on an Asian manufacturing model from the beginning, so it never had a strong domestic production foothold to begin with. Only their Air bag cushioning inserts are partially made in their IHM facilities, a division that is also a general supplier of industrial Polyurethane films and sheets.

Saucony was originally a US brand and made shoes locally till the early ’90s. But its ownership has changed hands a few times and they no longer sell US-manufactured shoes. Interestingly, Saucony’s current owner is Wolverine Worldwide Inc, a company that also owns the Merrell and Wolverine work boot brand.

The Wolverine brand makes a few of their shoes in the US, so if Saucony really tried, they could come up with a small collection. After all, they bid for the same US military shoe contract that ultimately went to New Balance.

adidas is interesting. Being a German company, its manufacturing base originated in Europe, followed by outsourcing to Asia. A few years ago, they set up a ‘Speedfactory’ in Georgia – a pilot concept with a focus on automation in footwear production. If you want to know more, this Solereview article will help.

There’s some bad news about the Speedfactory though. It closed as quickly as it opened; the concept production facility was shut in April 2020. Thus, the Speedfactory AM4 Ultraboost no longer features in this guide.

After all, footwear production is a difficult process to automate. Even 3D printing cannot help.

Before diving into the list, it’s important to clarify the difference between ‘Made in USA’ and ‘Assembled in USA’ footwear. The percentage of local content needs to be at least 70% to qualify as ‘made in USA.’ Else, it’s ‘Assembled in the USA.’

This is only for the US; other countries will have different standards. For example, in Canada, the level of localization needs to be 51% or more.

Besides the country of origin, do US-made running shoes offer any advantage over outsourced ones? Functionally speaking, that is?

No. The manufacturing process of industrial products such as running shoes is highly standardized. The way the uppers are cut and put together is the same, and so is the sole molding and fixing process.

Since US-made and assembled shoes aren’t superior to their Asian versions, buying one should be nothing more than a matter of personal choice. Things like supporting your local economy, that kind of stuff.

As we said, this list is New Balance through and through; this guide grows smaller with each year.

1) New Balance 1540V3

What? Another 15-ounce (14.9 to be exact) stability shoe? Either by chance or design, most US-produced New Balance shoes are heavy-duty stability running or walking shoes. But if you’re are a part of the consumer demographic that prefers stiff and heavy running shoes, rejoice.

The 1540 V3 doesn’t have a humongous medial wedge. Its stability manners come from the wide outsole geometry and dual-density midsole with a sloped medial post and TPU ‘Rollbar’.

The upper has a conventional cut-stitch-and-assemble design which, honestly, feels out of place on a shoe that retails at $170. While there’s sufficient room upfront, the tongue is short and could do with more padding.

2) New Balance 990V5

The 13.7-ounce 990V5 isn’t your modern ‘running’ shoe. It uses midsole tech that was lost to time during the 1990s – like the Encap PU cassette with a softer EVA core. The upper is made of suede, closed mesh, and molded TPU trims – all relics of an era gone by.

With its cushy Ortholite insole and multi-density midsole, this is a comfortable walking shoe at best; run in the 990 at your peril.

Or in New Balance’s words, “worn by supermodels in London and dads in Ohio.”

3) New Balance Made in US 993

Nothing about the 993 suggests that it is a modern running shoe, because it’s not. It weighs over 400 grams, has a firm multi-density midsole, and the upper is covered with stitched overlays.

Acres of suede leather are sewn to the spacer mesh, and the outsole has rubber – lots of it. The tongue and heel have a soft and padded lining with a vintage feel.

In short, the 993 looks straight out of a dog-eared 90’s yearbook. An age when ‘online’ shopping meant glossy mail-order catalogs and not the internet.

And yet, the 993 has a couple of things going for it. One, it’s assembled in the US. Two, it is a comfortable and stable shoe for low-impact activities such as slow running (aka jogging) and walks.

4) New Balance Postal 706V2

As the name suggests, the Postal 706V2 is designed specifically for postal workers. Also worth noting is the absence of the New Balance logo on its side – a nod to the shoe’s institutional order origins.

The 706 is a robust product meant for all-day walking that’s often done with heavy postal deliveries. So everything on the shoe is built to take abuse. The upper is stitched together using thick leather panels, and the midsole is made of solid Polyurethane (the poured kind, not e-TPU) for long-term durability.

The ride is firm as expected of a PU midsole, though there’s some step-in softness provided by the chunky insole.

This may not be the lightest or softest walking shoe, but another Made-in-US option to consider.

Do you own any of these shoes? Improve this review by sharing your insights – submit a review here.

Other reviews and guides