When you make a purchase using the retailer links in our reviews, we may earn a small commission. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Solereview does not publish sponsored content nor receive free samples. We usually buy products at full retail price.

Best running shoes for overpronation

Best_Running_Shoes_for_overpronation_2020

This article has been updated with current models for October 2020. The Asics Kayano 26, Asics GT-2000 8, and the New Balance 860V10 have been replaced with their redesigned versions. The New Balance Prism EnergyStreak and Saucony Omni 19 are new additions. The Mizuno Wave Horizon 3 and Reebok Grasse ST 2 Road have been removed.

Let us guess. You’re here because you probably had a ‘gait analysis’ done at a shoe store and were advised to wear running shoes that ‘reduces’ or ‘corrects’ your pronation.

Or you read something about overpronation on the internet, so you landed on this page to do further research before finally deciding which shoe to buy.

But let’s make it clear right away – these so-called stability running shoes will not ‘cure’ or even correct your overpronation. Everyone pronates; this inward-rolling movement is a naturally occurring component of the gait cycle. The only difference is that a certain population of runners roll in a lot more than the others.

To counter the exaggerated movement, the ‘medial-post’ was invented a few decades ago. This is a firmer wedge of foam on the inner midsole. The underlying theory was that the harder inner midsole prevents the foot from rolling excessively inwards.

It sounded great on paper and also made sense in the 70s and 80s. Back then, running shoes had thin, blown EVA foam midsoles that packed quickly and lost their structure within a few weeks. We already covered this subject in detail in one of our 2015 shoe reviews, so we won’t devote any more screen space.

The bottomline is – modern-day stability running shoes with a medial-post are redundant. Perhaps vintage stability shoes were partially effective, but then those were ugly looking beasts with over-sized medial-posts. Now that’s a medial post.

Midsole foams have come of age, so even neutral shoes are supportive enough. To nobody’s surprise, recent traditional stability shoe updates have evolved into supportive neutrals. Look no further than the New Balance Vongo or the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 for proof.

So if traditional overpronation-control shoes are a relic of the past, then why does this buyer’s guide exist?

There are two reasons. The first is to tell you that you don’t need expensive ‘pronation-control’ running shoes.

The other reason is that a lot of runners want the feeling of a firmer medial wedge, the same way some prefer insoles that provide a sense of under-arch support.

At the end of the day, wearing a medially-posted running shoe is a personal choice. To that end, we’ve put together a list of traditional stability shoes.

Unlike our other stability shoe guide that also included non-posted support shoes and stable neutrals, this article only focuses on models with a firmer stability wedge.

So if you don’t see shoes like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20, you know why. adidas and Mizuno also do not sell shoes with a medial post, so they’re left out too. The Saucony Guide ISO 2 graced this guide last year, but the new Guide 13 does not. Ditto for the Hurricane 22 and the Brooks Beast 20.

One good thing about most shoes on this guide is that their wedges aren’t intrusive. So even runners who otherwise run in ‘neutral’ shoes can buy them without any worries.

Here’re our picks, sorted alphabetically.

1) Asics Gel-Kayano 27

Not a lot has changed on the Kayano 27; all the familiar parts are where they belong. A firmer medial wedge graces the inner midsole, and a visible Gel pad is sandwiched between the foam layers of the rearfoot.

On top, a plush engineered mesh upper delivers a fit and feel that is close to the 26. This is Asics’s premier stability shoe, so an obligatory external clip provides heel support.

This year’s Kayano is noticeably softer under the forefoot. Most of Asics’s current generation models are turning softer, and the Kayano gets the same treatment.

Forefoot strikers will find the ride a little more forgiving than the last time. The better balance of softness between the front and rear makes the ride more connected and cohesive.

At its core, the Kayano 27 remains a reliable stability trainer for everyday runs and long-distance workouts alike.

2) Asics Gel GT-2000 9

Though the ‘Kayano Lite’ is actually a thing, the Asics GT-2000 has long been the designated ‘Lite’ version of the more expensive Kayano. The GT-2000 9 is more than an-ounce lighter, and its $120 retail price is a lighter financial burden.

The GT-2K also has a medial post, except that everything is toned down to result in the aforementioned weight difference.

The end product is a traditional stability shoe than feels lighter and more versatile than the pricier Kayano. Lower weight also makes the shoe feel faster, and yet the cushioning is comfortable enough for runs of varying ranges.

Unlike the Kayano, the upper keeps trims and frills to a minimum. The engineered mesh shell fits comfortably and true-to-size, whereas molded details on the midfoot and heel lend the upper structural support and aesthetic appeal.

Similar to the New Balance 860 or the Nike Structure, the GT-2000 9 is a tried and tested ‘middle-ground’ running shoe with a medial post.

Also see: Asics GT-2000 Lite-show (reflective) and Asics GT-2000 trail.

3) Asics GT-1000 9

The GT-1000 9 gets you a mild motion-control ride experience. There is a firmer medial post (Duomax), but it’s tiny and does not affect the overall ride dynamics.

There is a slight cushioning bias that favors the outer midsole but that’s precisely why this model features on this guide. The midsole geometry gets you a firmer inner midsole and a softer outer sidewall. That’s understandable considering that the outer side has a visible Gel pad for softness.

At one point in time, the GT 1000 used to feel like a cheaply-made running shoe. In 2020, that’s no longer the case. Though the upper has a basic mesh construction, it uses soft heel and tongue lining materials to produce a secure and comfortable fit.

If you’re unfamiliar with Asics’s stability shoe line-up, know that the GT-1000 is part of the unofficial Kayano/GT-2000/GT-1000 group. The Kayano is the premium stability trainer (and the most expensive), followed by the 2000 and then the 1000.

4) Brooks Addiction 14

There’s a lot of the Brooks Beast 18 in this shoe. We say that because the Beast 20 is a ‘Guiderail’ convert and no longer has a medial wedge. That’s also the reason why the Beast 20 doesn’t show up on the 2020 edit of this article.

The Addiction 14 gets you the cushioned and supportive stability shoe experience. The wide midsole and outsole deliver a planted ride while the firm and large medial post have the retro stability shoe feel.

Even the upper has a lot of the Beast 18 (and 20) in it. The engineered mesh and the plush heel and tongue join forces to produce a comfortable and spacious upper fit.

The Addiction is also available in multiple widths.

5) New Balance Fresh Foam 860V11

The 2020 update for the 860 is perhaps one of its most significant yet. Though the shoe hasn’t got rid of the medial post like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 20 or the Saucony Guide 13, the design changes are worth mentioning.

This year, the 860 transitions from a blended medial post set-up to a smaller wedge with a sloped design. This leaves a margin of soft foam layer above and to the rear of the wedge. The said update dials down the 860’s motion-control feel and steers it closer towards the neutral trainer territory.

The other big story is the 860’s switch to a Fresh Foam midsole. While the design still relies on triple-density foam, the overall ride is softer and more responsive than the 860V10.

Many changes take place on the upper too. The heel gets the flared collar from the 1080, and the midfoot fit is smoother. Both are functional improvements for most runners who are moving up from the 860 V10.

6) New Balance FuelCell Prism EnergyStreak

The NB Fuelcell Prism EnergyStreak has the distinction of being the mildest ‘stability’ shoe on this guide. It is also the softest and lightest – thanks to its midsole material. The firmer medial-post is surrounded by a softer foam, so it doesn’t make its presence felt; just ever so slightly.

The Prism ES isn’t your regular stability shoe. It’s got a cushioned-trainer-meets-tempo-trainer-meets-860 kind of a vibe, and that bodes well for its versatility.

On one hand, the soft and planted ride makes short work of easygoing runs. The same cushioning extends the Prism ES’s mileage range while feeling efficient enough for peppier runs. The streamlined upper also lends a fast-shoe feel to the Prism.

This option works if you want just the slightest hint of a medial-post in your running shoe.

7) Nike Air Zoom Structure 22

There used to be a time when Nike had a three-tiered stability shoe construct in the form of the Odyssey, Structure, and the Perseus.

But the glory days of traditional stability shoes are long gone, and the Structure 22 is the last one standing. It will be likely be replaced by the React Infinity Run, based on how Nike is marketing the latter. Or maybe the Structure will stay in the assortment indefinitely, in the same way the Nike Free 2018 has.

Even mild-stability models like the Lunarglide and Lunareclipse are off Nike’s menu, so the Structure is the only medially posted shoe available. The upper is true-to-size, sleeved, and smooth inside. The Flywire cables work with the lacing for a secure midfoot fit.

The ride is firm – more so than other shoes like the Asics GT-2000 or the New Balance 860. Also, the Structure’s Zoom Air-powered forefoot adds a different flavor to the ride.

8) Saucony Omni 19

Just because this list is sorted alphabetically, the Saucony Omni 19 is the last shoe to feature on this guide. So it’s merely coincidental that the Omni 19 happens to be the most traditional motion-control shoe here. It has none of the new-fangled foams or sleek uppers.

Looking at the Omni 19 is like rewinding the clock back to 2012; there’s nothing that suggests that this shoe belongs in 2020.

A very large medial-post stands out with its marbled treatment, and that’s something that can be felt under the foot too. The midsole may be Pwrrun, but its firm ride is a reminder of the older Saucony designs. It is very supportive but has the motion-control flavor due to the dual-density construction.

There’s not a lot happening on the upper either. Just some good old-fashioned engineered mesh cobbled together with welded overlays and padded lining; this combination produces a predictably comfortable and secure fit.

If the idea of a medial-post turns on your running shoe geekness, then make the Omni 19 your next purchase.

Do you own any of these shoes? Improve this review by sharing your insights – submit a review here.