In this product guide:
- 1. Soft cushioning for heavy runners: Asics Nimbus 26
- 2. Daily trainer for heavy runners: Saucony Ride 17
- 3. Stability shoe for heavy runners: Asics Kayano 31
- 4. Supportive cushioning for heavy runners: ON Cloudmonster 2
- 5. Marathon racer for heavy runners: adidas Adios Pro 3
- 6. Versatile cushioning for heavy runners: Asics Superblast 2
- 7. Orthotic-friendly trainer for heavy runners: Saucony Echelon 9
- 8. 5K racer for heavy runners: adidas adios 8
- 9. Trail running shoe for heavy runners: Brooks Cascadia 18
- How we selected
Except for the slightly firmer ride and tighter upper, there’s not much change between the Nimbus 25 and 26. Just like the last time, the full-length Flytefoam stack has a wide base that creates a cushioned yet stable foundation.
The Nimbus 26’s cushioning is a bit firmer than the 25, so it’s marginally better for heavier runners. The lack of cushioning bias also makes the Nimbus 26 very neutral and supportive on both sides.
The Flytefoam midsole is also ideal for long-distance comfort, and doesn’t feel slow. The mild forefoot rocker also helps with the transitions.
The true-to-size upper blends interior smoothness with a plush and secure grip. The Nimbus 26 has a warm upper, so this is not ideal for summer marathons. Consider the Brooks Glycerin 21 for better ventilation.
Also recommended: The Hoka Bondi 8.
- Asics’s marketing pitch: Add comfort to every step.
- Upper: Engineered mesh, inner gusset.
- Midsole: Flytefoam Blast+ foam, heel Gel unit. 8 mm heel drop.
- Outsole: Hybrid Asicsgrip rubber.
- Weight: 305 gms/ 10.7 Oz for a half pair of Men’s US 9/UK 8/EUR 42.5/CM 27.
- Stack heights: 42 mm (heel), 34 mm (forefoot).
- Available widths: D – regular (reviewed), 2E (wide), 4E (extra-wide).
- Previous model: Asics Nimbus 26
- Country of origin: Indonesia.
- Recommended use: Daily trainer for easy runs, half-marathons.
- Footstrike orientation: Heel, midfoot/forefoot (full contact).
- Median lifespan: 400 miles.
- Recommended paces: Slower than 5:00 min/km (8:00 min/mile).
- Recommended temperature range: Warmer than -5° C/23° F.
Pros
- Ride comfort for easy efforts
- Supportive and neutral cushioning
- Smooth transitions
- Optional wide, extra-wide sizes
Cons
- Upper is not breathable
- Low versatility
- Low reflectivity
- Printed heel loop may irritate
- Outsole grip needs further improvement
The Ride 17’s midsole is made of Pwrrun+, an expanded PU foam that has always been kind to heavy runners. In the past, the very capable Saucony Triumph 20 and 21 used Pwrrun+. The adidas UltraBoost Light also uses expanded PU foam for its midsole.
So you get the idea. The Pwrrun+ foam hits the sweet spot between cushioning comfort and ride stability, and that’s what makes the Ride 17 good for heavy runners. While comfortable for up to a half-marathon, the cushioning is tinged with firmness. The high midsole edges keep the foot locked over the heel.
Just like the Ride 16, the new model gets a cushy footbed made of the same material as the midsole.
The upper fits true-to-size and is slightly warmer than the previous version.
- Saucony’s marketing pitch: A truly versatile shoe, from warm up to tempo runs.
- Upper: Engineered mesh, internal gusset.
- Midsole: Expanded Polyurethane (Pwrrun+) foam. 8 mm heel drop.
- Outsole: Carbon rubber in high-wear areas.
- Weight: 282 gms/ 9.9 Oz for a half pair of Men’s US 9/UK 8/EUR 42.5/CM 27.
- Stack heights: 35 mm (heel), 27 mm (forefoot).
- Available widths: D – regular (reviewed), 2E – Wide.
- Previous model: Saucony Ride 16.
- Country of origin: Vietnam.
- Recommended use: Daily training, tempo runs, half-marathons.
- Footstrike orientation: Heel, midfoot/forefoot (full contact).
- Recommended paces: 4:30 min/km (7:30 min/mile) and slower.
- Median lifespan: 500 miles.
- Recommended temperature range: Warmer than -5° C/23° F.
Pros
- Just-right upper fit
- Neutral and supportive ride
- Smooth cushioning
- Versatile ride character
- Optional widths
- Comfortable interiors
Cons
- Upper runs warm in summer
- Low reflectivity
- Heel loop needs to be bigger
If you overpronate – meaning if your foot tends to roll in excessively on the arch side – then a motion-control shoe like the Kayano 31 may be right for you.
The Kayano’s midsole design limits the extent of inward roll. It has a more supportive inner sidewall as well as a sloped negative space under the heel.
The supportive midsole keeps the foot from rolling inwards. Working together is the sloped groove that directs the loading away from the arch side.
The midsole uses a brand-new Flytefoam instead of the EVA blend that the Kayano 30 had. It creates a cushioned base that is also stable. This way, heavy runners benefit from the Kayano’s suite of motion-control features but also the ride stability.
As noted in our review, the fit and feel of the upper is excellent. Additional widths are available for Clydesdales.
- Asics’s marketing pitch: Stability never felt like this.
- Upper: Engineered spacer mesh, inner gusset.
- Midsole: Flytefoam Blast+ foam, heel Gel unit. 10 mm heel drop.
- Outsole: Hybrid Asicsgrip rubber.
- Weight: 305 gms/ 10.7 Oz for a half pair of Men’s US 9/UK 8/EUR 42.5/CM 27.
- Stack heights: 40 mm (heel), 30 mm (forefoot).
- Available widths: D – regular (reviewed), 2E (wide), 4E (extra-wide).
- Previous model: Asics Kayano 30.
- Country of origin: Vietnam.
- Recommended use: Everyday training, tempo runs, marathons.
- Footstrike orientation: Heel, midfoot/forefoot (full contact).
- Median lifespan: 450 miles.
- Recommended paces: Slower than 4:00 min/km (6:30 min/mile).
- Recommended temperature range: Warmer than -5° C/23° F.
Pros
- Effective motion control
- Long-distance comfort
- Efficient transitons, versatile
- Outsole grip
- Plush and secure fit
- Optional widths
Cons
- Heavy
The ON Cloudmonster 2’s firm midsole and unique geometry makes it supportive enough for heavy runners.
The cushioning doesn’t come from the foam, but from the hollow chambers that collapse and rebound when loaded. Sure, there’s a very comfortable insole under the foot, but that’s just for the step-in comfort.
Unlike most cushioned shoes that use a soft midsole, the hollow chambers quickly spring back to their original shape. This way, the midsole compression is localized at the point of loading.
In contrast, a larger section of the midsole stays compressed on much softer shoes – like the New Balance 1080V13, for example. That usually affects the stability negatively. The Cloudmonster’s cushioning avoids that scenario by being ‘mechanical’ and not foam-based.
This behavior makes the ON Cloudmonster very stable despite its tall stack heights. There’s ample comfort for up to a marathon, but without any loss of stability.
The upper fits very long, so we recommend buying a half-size smaller. For instance, if you usually wear a US 10 in other brands, a US 9.5 in the Cloudmonster should do it.
- ON’s marketing pitch: Max-cushioned, max energy return road runners.
- Upper: Engineered mesh, full inner sleeve.
- Midsole: Dual-density EVA foam, Nylon board. 6 mm heel drop.
- Outsole: Carbon rubber in high-wear areas.
- Weight: 295 gms/ 10.4 Oz for a half pair of Men’s US 9/UK 8.5/EUR 42.5/CM 27.
- Stack heights: 35 mm (heel), 29 mm (forefoot).
- Available widths: Single, D – regular (reviewed)
- Previous model: ON Cloudmonster.
- Country of origin: Vietnam.
- Recommended use: Daily cruiser, half-marathons, marathons.
- Footstrike orientation: Heel, midfoot/forefoot (full contact).
- Median lifespan: 400 miles.
- Recommended temperature range: Warmer than -5° C/23° F.
Pros
- Long-distance comfort
- Ride stability
- Smooth transitions
- Excellent build quality
- Comfortable upper fit
Cons
- Heavy
- Low versatility
- No optional width(s)
- Poor value for money
- Sizing is a hit or miss
Modern marathon racers make extensive use of softer PEBA and other superfoams, so the midsole stability has become a weak point for such shoes. PEBA racers like the Vaporfly 3 and Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 don’t do very well under heavy loads.
This is where the adidas Adios Pro 3 makes a difference. The Lightstrike Pro foam is more resilient and feels denser than materials like Nike ZoomX, New Balance Fuelcell, and Saucony Pwrrun PB.
And it’s not just the foam; the stiff ‘Energy Rods’ add stability by spreading out inside the midsole. The Adios Pro 3 is also one of the few super-shoes that work well for heel strikers as well.
While the secure upper fits true-to-size, the eyelet bump under the first lacing row may be potentially irritating for some runners.
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, most runners will be familiar with the versatile nature of the Asics Superblast – both the V1 and V2. It’s comfortable yet quick enough for a marathon. Its above-average durability and versatility make it an excellent daily trainer. The true-to-size upper fits securely, with the Superblast 2 having more toe-box room than the Superblast V1.
And thanks to the thick stack of Flytefoam Turbo foam, the Superblast 2 offers a high cushioning-to-weight ratio. And if all that wasn’t enough, the Asics Superblast 2 works very well even heavily loaded.
Unlike most cushioned midsole that bottoms out or collapses under heavy loads, the Superblast’s midsole maintains its structure. The Flytefoam core doesn’t deform when loaded and the firmer (made of a different foam) creates a stable base. This results in better stability and consistent cushioning over comparable shoes.
Asics has made changes to the outsole design and rubber compounding, so the Superblast 2’s forefoot grip is superior to the V1.
- Asics’s marketing pitch:Supercharged, super responsive.
- Upper: Engineered mesh, inner gusset.
- Midsole: Flytefoam Turbo, FF Blast Plus foam, 8 mm heel drop.
- Outsole: Asicsgrip carbon rubber.
- Weight: 250 gms/ 8.8 Oz for a half pair of Men’s US 9/UK 8/EUR 42.5/CM 27.
- Stack heights: 45 mm (heel), 37 mm (forefoot).
- Available widths: Single – D (regular).
- Previous model: Asics Superblast.
- Country of origin: Vietnam.
- Recommended use: Everyday training, tempo runs, marathons.
- Footstrike orientation: Heel, midfoot/forefoot (full contact).
- Median lifespan: 500 miles.
- Recommended paces: Slower than 3:30 min/km (5:30 min/mile).
- Recommended temperature range: Warmer than -0° C/32° F.
Pros
- High cushioning-to-weight ratio
- Supportive and neutral cushioning
- Speed friendly rocker midsole
- Spacious toe box
- Lightweight
Cons
- Lack of optional widths
- Low reflectivity
- Weaker foot-midsole connection than the V1
There are many reasons why the Echelon 9 features in this article.
Saucony uses the cushioned yet supportive Pwrrun midsole foam here, thus infusing the Echelon 9 with high levels of inherent stability. If that wasn’t enough, the outsole has an ultra-broad footprint for greater contact surface.
The midsole material and geometry create a ride that is cushioned but also solid-footed. The Echelon 9 loses a lot of weight compared to the Echelon 8. Whereas the Echelon 8 weighed more than 12 ounces; the Echelon 9 is a 10.3-ounce (292-gram) shoe.
For heavy runners who rely on a customized insole, the Echelon 9 has a thick PU insole that can be swapped with an aftermarket orthotic. There’s more upper space available in the optional wide and extra-wide sizes.
The soft upper is very plush; the heel collar and tongue are generously padded and use soft lining materials. An inner gusset makes the fit smooth while also keeping the tongue in place.
As a road racer for shorter (5K – 10K) runs, the adidas Adios 8 is a great fit for most runners, heavy or not. It’s lightweight, very stable, and yet cushioned enough for distances of up to 10k.
The Continental rubber outsole provides plenty of traction during speed runs, whereas the breathable upper keeps the foot locked in.
The adidas adios 8’s midsole combines the softer Lightstrike Pro foam under the forefoot with a firmer EVA frame under the heel.
This dual-density stack distributes stability and comfort where they’re needed the most. It’s stable under the rearfoot for heavy runners, and the low-profile forefoot delivers cushioning without compromising stability and ground feel.
The Brooks Cascadia has always been a reliable pick for heavy runners, and it’s no different this time.
The firmly cushioned midsole uses an internal rock plate called ‘Trail adapt’. It’s an articulated plate with ‘wings’ supporting the rearfoot. This stiff component stabilizes the foot on uneven terrain without sacrificing cushioning protection. This setup is identical to the Cascadia 17, so the Cascadia 18 is an upper-only change for this year.
The stable ride makes the Cascadia 18 an excellent choice for large-framed runners.
The firm midsole has inherent stability over uneven surfaces, and the unique rock plate adds forefoot protection and stiffness. The 8 mm heel-to-toe offset makes the transitions smoother.
The outsole combines an aggressive lug geometry with the sticky ‘Trailtack’ rubber to deliver a confidence-inspiring grip on the trails.
How we selected: What to look for
You’re probably reading this guide because you weigh more than 200 lbs/90 kilos. However, the word ‘heavy’ can mean so many things. For example, we could be talking about a large-framed runner with feet to match. Also, low or flat arches may not necessarily be a part of the discussion – many heavy runners have a regular arch.
When searching for suitable running shoes, you’ll likely hear the following shopping advice:
“Buy a running shoe with the softest cushioning. They’re the best for heavy runners.” Or, “You can’t go wrong with a stability shoe for overpronators.”
Wrong. That’s not great advice at all.
We understand why most people recommend max-soft or motion-control shoes. The underlying (and misinformed) logic is that a softer ride equals better shock absorption. However, that simply isn’t true; there is no scientific evidence behind this theory.
A running shoe that’s excessively soft can do more harm than good when it concerns a high bodyweight. Here’s why:
An uber-soft running shoe is unstable for high bodyweight.
A shoe that feels supportive for a 150 lb runner might end up throwing a heavier individual around. If the midsole isn’t supportive, then that translates into a higher workload for the body.
During each phase of the gait cycle, the body has to work harder to compensate for the unstable shoe. This increases the chances of injuries.
Excessive midsole softness can cause the shoe to bottom out.
The Asics Nimbus 17 was a perfect example of this in action. Its midsole was so mushy that it bottomed out even if you were a 150-pounder, and parts of the outsole were felt during runs.
An extremely soft shoe will lead to significant variance between the static and dynamic heel drop.
An often overlooked aspect is that there can be a huge difference between the published heel drop and the dynamic offset of ultra-soft running shoes.
The heel-to-toe offset is the difference between the heel and forefoot midsole thickness, and brands often advertise this number. For many shoe geeks, this number is an influencing factor when buying running shoes.
However, the static heel drop should be taken with a huge grain of salt. When fully loaded, the real heel offset of a shoe can vary a lot from the static drop. A shoe with a firm midsole keeps this variance low.
Running in a very soft shoe will result in a lower heel gradient than expected; more so when the foot-strike load is in multiples of 200 lbs.
Depending on how soft a midsole is, a ’10 mm’ drop could turn into a 4 mm offset during runs. This could strain the Achilles or Calf muscle if you’re not used to running in footwear with a low heel drop.
Super-soft cushioning has lower durability.
Except for newer materials like adidas Boost, Saucony Pwrrun PB, or Nike ZoomX, EVA foam-based midsoles tend to lose their cushioning after a few hundred miles. A heavy runner using a shoe made of a soft EVA foam compound is likely to fatigue it sooner than a lighter runner.
So far, we’ve painted super-soft running shoes in a poor light, but there are exceptions. Certain shoes made from new-gen foams can be very soft, yet durable with acceptable levels of stability.
Softness and cushioning are often used interchangeably. But cushioning – which is loosely defined as the ability to protect the foot from impact forces – also exists in firmer shoes. So it is important to buy a shoe that is cushioned yet supportive; the kind that can safely manage a 200+ lb body weight over hundreds of miles.
Many cushioned and supportive running shoes exist, but it is a challenge to sift through the confusing assortment of products.
To help narrow the search, we’ve curated over a dozen running shoes. This buyer’s guide is far from exhaustive but a good place to start. Included here are regular trainers, heavy stability shoes, trail running shoes, and racing flats.