Best running shoes for marathons

by Solereview editors

Toronto Marathon hydration

This article has been updated with current models for April 2022. The New Balance 1080V11 has been replaced with its updated version. Except for the narrower ‘B’ width, the women’s models are almost identical to men’s.

If you didn’t know it already, marathons are hard.

Many years ago, we remember talking to someone about his first marathon. And this person didn’t even train for one, he just decided to run a major – think it was the Boston – marathon on a whim. Didn’t ask how he managed to qualify though – perhaps he got in through the charity route. But his story checks out.

He remarked that his lower body was ‘destroyed’ after that marathon; he hobbled for a week after the race. But here’s the thing – he wasn’t out of shape. Being a recreational but borderline competitive climber, he was supremely fit by most standards. He had a strong core with exceptional upper and lower body strength.

And he worked for a major shoe brand, so he wore the best running shoe available at the time. That didn’t help either.

Aha – you’d say. It’s the runner and not the shoe, after all. Our friend made it obvious (and painfully so) that proficiency in a sport doesn’t mean you can run 26.2 miles without training – even with the best running shoes. Long-distance runs are a feat of endurance and not brute strength, thus requiring a completely different training regime.

Most of us have also seen elite runners break marathon PR’s in a pair of racing flats that are nothing more than a thin piece of foam glued to a mesh upper.

So if running shoes make no difference at all, then what’s the point of this guide?

Let us ask you something – and be honest here. If you are a non-elite athlete running a marathon in a pair of flats, wouldn’t you crave more cushioning after mile 10? The kind of running shoe that goes easy on your feet? And an upper with enough room for your toes instead of squeezing them in a vice-like grip?

Toronto marathon CN Tower background

Even if you’ve trained religiously for over six months before running a marathon, every bit helps – even running shoes.

While many experienced runners have no problem running longer distances in flats, most of us will appreciate the extra comfort.

The racing shoe landscape has also evolved by leaps and bounds. A decade ago, a road racer meant a racing flat – a running shoe with minimal cushioning.

In 2022, if a marathon shoe doesn’t have a plate inside a midsole filled to the brim with bouncy cushioning, then it’s likely to end up on a close-out sale. Or maybe the Japanese purists will buy them.

Thus, if given a choice, why bother wearing uncomfortable flats?

Toronto Marathon CNE grounds

Given the context, this guide focuses on cushioned running shoes. If you rather prefer flats or products of a similar nature, try the shoes from our guides for 5K and 10K races.

If this guide was compiled in 2014, it would have looked completely different. Save for a few Hokas, there weren’t many maximal cushioning shoes available. Most midsole foams were also limited to e-TPU and EVA variants. Even New Balance’s then newly-introduced Fresh Foam cushioning was disappointingly pedestrian. It’s a lot better today, though – that’s why we have the 1080V12 here.

Back then, we would have featured cushioned trainers such as the adidas Supernova Glide, Nike Pegasus, and the Saucony Ride. The likes of these have always been dependable, do-it-all options – something that doesn’t change in 2022 either. As you scroll down this page, you’ll come across familiar names like the Brooks Ghost.

This product guide includes several shoes with midsole plates. Our top pick is the Saucony Endorphin Speed 2 due to its combination of ride character, upper fit, and compelling value proposition – it’s the only PEBA midsole shoe (with a plate) at a $160 price. Just so that you know, it’s just a minor update to the Speed V1 with no change in the ride quality.

The Nike Vaporfly Next % 2 is here too, as well as the latest Zoom Fly 4. As for the Alphafly Next%, we tested it recently but found it to offer no significant benefit over the Vaporfly.

The Brooks Hyperion Elite V2 is nice too, but it doesn’t feature on this guide. The DNA Flash is Nitrogen-infused EVA foam, so while it’s incredibly lightweight and comfortable, the firmer quality works better in a shoe like plate-less Hyperion Tempo. Also, the plate design doesn’t result in a springboard-like effect; it just guides the transitions, that’s all.

We also recommend the New Balance Fuelcell Rebel 2. The hyper lightweight shoe packs a high cushioning-to-weight ratio, and works well for most use-cases.

Unlike most of our guides, our top marathon shoe picks are arranged in the order of Solereview’s preference.

1) Saucony Endorphin Speed 2

The Endorphin Speed 2 is Solereview’s running shoe of choice for long-distance training and marathons, because it delivers an excellent blend of distance-friendly cushioning and speed. It weighs less than 8-ounces, and that makes high-mileage sessions light on the feet.

We prefer the Saucony Endorphin Speed 2 over the Pro version. Its $160 MSRP and a similar ride character make it a better value proposition than the Endorphin Pro 2.

Pwrrun PB foam on the Saucony Endorphin Pro

Meet Pwrrun PB – Saucony’s spin on the PEBA foam cushioning.

The Pwrrun PB delivers distance-friendly cushioning with springy responsiveness. The ‘PB’ part of Pwrrun PB pertains to PEBA – a lightweight cushioning foam that’s now become the favorite material for running shoe midsoles.

Saucony Endorphin Speed and New Balance RC Elite

The Saucony Endorphin Speed V2 (and New Balance RC Elite) in a marathon.

There’s also a Nylon plate inside this lightweight cushiness. It’s blended extremely well with the responsive midsole, and its integration feels seamless – one of the two reasons (the second is the more supportive upper) why we prefer the E-Speed over the Carbon-plated Pro.

The soft upper fits and breathes well, with enough space to accommodate slight increases in the foot volume during a marathon. An internal heel counter keeps the foot supported during runs.

The midsole isn’t the epitome of rearfoot stability, so neither the E-Speed nor Pro are recommended for track workouts or runs that involve sprinting into tight corners. The outsole grip isn’t great on wet surfaces either.

Both the Speed V1 and V2 have an identical ride due to the shared midsole, so we recommend reading our in-depth review of the Speed V1.

2) Nike Vaporfly Next % V2

The original Vaporfly 4% was the running shoe that lifted the entire racing shoe market out of minimal flats into the realm of Carbon plates and PEBA midsoles.

A ZoomX (PEBA foam) midsole of the VF 4% housed a Carbon plate that delivered the spring-like feel that we’ve all now come to appreciate. The Next % (V1) was based on a similar form factor as the 4%, except for a redesigned midsole and upper.

The V2 isn’t very different, considering that it uses the same midsole and outsole set-up as the V1. The lightweight, high-volume midsole acts as a deep cushioning reservoir that makes marathons less tiresome and more enjoyable – relatively speaking, of course. Unless you’re superhuman, marathons are not meant to be enjoyable. In our ultra-detailed review, we covered everything that you need to know about the Vaporfly Next% 2.

The Nike Vaporfly Next% 2 in a marathon.

The soft ride and peppy snap of the plate keeps the feet fresh during long-distance runs.

The plate does what it does best – providing a satisfying rearfoot snap and swift forefoot transitions. This way, the Vaporfly Next% V2 manages to blend highly responsive cushioning with a speed-friendly behavior.

Nike does not alter the fundamentals of the upper fit. The asymmetrical lacing system alleviates the top-down pressure; the deconstructed design makes the lightweight upper disappear over the foot – all while delivering a secure grip.

3) Nike Zoom Fly 4

Though the Vaporfly Next% 2 continues to be an excellent choice for marathon-level runs due to its unique ride experience, its high price is a hard pill to swallow.

If not the Next % 2, may we suggest the Zoom Fly 4?

Just like the Vaporfly, the Zoom Fly 4 has a carbon plate for forward-biased springiness. The only difference is that the Zoom Fly 4 uses Nike’s React foam instead of ZoomX, thus making the ride firmer. To find out more, here’s our detailed review of the Fly 4.

The Nike Zoom Fly 4 on the road.

While runners won’t find the characteristic soft bounce of the Vaporfly, the ZF4’s firm ride makes the shoe more stable – something that is a concern with the softer Vaporfly at slower speeds or uneven terrain.

The transitions also benefit from the firm midsole. The higher (8-10 mm) heel-to-toe offset is versatile enough for beginners as well as seasoned pros.

The internal midfoot strap of the Nike Zoom Fly 4.

The midfoot strapping system is split into thin strips for a better grip.

There’s plenty of comfort available for long-distance runs. The lightweight sleeved upper has a secure fit and helps keep the weight below 10-ounces.

If you liked the Zoom Fly 3, you’ll find the Zoom Fly 4 to be a slight improvement. The redesigned sleeve has a smoother wrap around the foot, and is relatively easier to cinch than the ZF3.

4) Hoka One One Clifton 8

The Hoka Clifton 8 doesn’t have a midsole plate, but it’s always been a popular choice for long runs and marathons – thanks to its cushioned ride and rockered geometry that allows for speed-friendly transitions. The EVA midsole lacks the pizzazz of lighter PEBA midsoles, but it still manages to hold out in a competitive market.

The thick forefoot has a high toe-spring that allows the foot to roll over during the push-off stance; the resilience of the compression-molded midsole makes it easier to power through the gait cycle.

If the upper space – or the lack thereof – is a potential concern, the optional 2E width offers more space. While the overall fit profile hasn’t changed, the tweaked upper has increased padding within the tongue and heel collar.

The Hoka Clifton 8 in a marathon.

The Hoka Clifton 8 in a marathon.

The V8’s new midsole and outsole design make it a mite firmer than the 7 – not because the foam density has changed. The redesigned outsole lugs on the forefoot no longer have a break that exposes the midsole foam. The heel crash pad also receives a similar update.

With the filled-in channels, the new outsole performs slightly better at transitions than the Clifton 7.

Also see: The Hoka Bondi 7.

5) New Balance Fresh Foam 1080V12

Despite all the new foams in the running shoe business, we believe that the Fresh Foam experience is (still) worth the price of admission.

The 1080V12’s EVA-blend midsole produces a smooth blend of cushioning, responsiveness, and transition-friendly manners. There’s sufficient cushioning available in this high-volume midsole for marathon distances, but without any speed-inhibiting mushiness. More details are our in-depth review of the 1080.

The Fresh Foam X midsole of the New Balance 1080 V12.

Despite its soft cushioning, the 1080V12 proves to be surprisingly versatile across different running speeds.

The ride is comfortable enough for marathon-level runs without feeling slow; the blown rubber outsole makes the transitions and landings smooth. The split outsole layout allows it to flex together with the soft foam stack.

The knit upper is soft, elastic, and wraps the forefoot securely; the flared heel lip is easy on the Achilles tendon. The sleeved interiors are smooth and create a distraction-free fit experience. For this year, New Balance claims that the new 1080V12’s upper contains at least 50% recycled content.

This being a New Balance shoe, there are three other optional widths to accommodate wider or narrower feet.

6) Asics Novablast 2

Asics’s Flytefoam cushioning has come a long way since it was first used on the Dynaflyte and Metaride. In its early days, Flytefoam was a firm ‘fiber-infused’ midsole material. Today, Flytefoam is offered in a variety of cushioning types.

In the Asics Novablast 2’s case, it’s the ‘Flytefoam Blast’ – a new cushioning material that has quickly become a crowd favorite.

Saucony Triumph 19 and Asics Novablast 2.

The Saucony Triumph 19 and Asics Novablast 2 in a marathon.

The Novablast isn’t an original idea, of course. There’s a lot of Hoka-inspired cushioning inside the midsole. The thick midsole has a pronounced rocker shape so the ride is cushioned and efficient at the same time.

This new foam isn’t mushy and yet there’s ample comfort for long-distance runs and marathons. The high toe-spring (rocker) of the midsole helps the foot roll through the gait cycle quicker.

Just know that the heel stability isn’t great due to its slim profile. The fit runs a tad long, so some people may need to go a half-size down.

7) Asics Glideride 2

Asics sailed into previously uncharted waters with the first edition of the GlideRide (and Metaride), as it evolved out of its trusted Gel + Trusstic shank form factor.

If the Novablast was all about an all-foam ride delivered by a high toe and heel spring, the Glideride 2 takes the rocker concept quite literally. Here, a stiff Nylon plate acts as an actual rocker.

Understandably, the Glideride isn’t as cushy as the Novablast but is enjoyable – albeit in a different way.

Asics Glideride 2 womens toe spring

Most of the forefoot is suspended in the air; this produces the signature forward ‘roll’.

The stiff plate allows the foot to roll over during the transitions, so the shoe feels surprisingly effortless for its bulk. There’s plenty of cushioning too, and with that comes long-distance comfort. And that’s why it’s featured on this guide of marathon-worthy shoes.

It’s worth highlighting the difference between other plated shoes (Nike Vaporfly, Saucony Endorphin, et. al) and the Glideride. Other running shoes with embedded Carbon plates produce a ‘springboard’ effect under the heel to launch you forward.

The Asics Glideride V2 does no such thing – the forefoot plate just makes it easier for the foot to roll through the push-off stage. We cover the details in our wear-tested review of the Glideride 2.

If you can do with a lower cushioning stack, may we recommend the excellent Asics Metaracer?

8) Saucony Triumph 19

The Saucony Triumph 17 was a significant milestone in the evolution of this popular series. The midsole swapped the firm and dense Everun foam for a softer and more responsive Pwrrun+.

On paper, both the cushioning technologies shared the identical (expanded Polyurethane) foam. And yet the Triumph 17 felt markedly different than the preceding Triumph ISO 5, a difference that translated into a plusher ride that drew from the deeply-cushioned midsole.

The Triumph 18 had a lot of the Triumph 17 in it. The midsole packs enough comfort for runs of double-digit distances, all while being springy in its cushioning delivery. The Triumph 19 shares an identical sole with the 18, so there’s no difference in the ride quality.

However, the highlight of the Triumph 19 is the new upper. The mesh is lighter and more breathable, so the interiors are no longer as stuffy as they once used to be. The fit is true-to-size, breathable, and accommodating.

9) New Balance Fuelcell Rebel V2

It’s hard to stereotype the New Balance Fuelcell Rebel V2. At the time of writing these words, it’s a unique running shoe with few parallels.

The Rebel 2 is a highly-cushioned 7.2-ounce trainer that’s also built like an ultralight racer. To find out more, here’s our in-depth review.

The midsole foam of the New Balance Fuelcell Rebel V2.

The Fuelcell foam is bouncy and soft – just the thing for comfortable tempo runs.

The Rebel’s super bouncy and comfortable ride gives it a lot of versatility. For example, the Rebel has enough pep to be used for tempo runs. At the same time, the soft cushioning is sufficiently comfortable for marathons.

Of course, you won’t get Saucony Endorphin Pro or Nike Vaporfly levels of deep cushioning, but the Rebel is a happy middle-ground between low-profile trainers like the New Balance Fresh Foam Tempo and plate-equipped cushioned racers.

The toe-box of the New Balance Fuelcell Rebel V2.

The breathable upper of the New Balance Rebel 2 keeps the heat down.

The upper is extremely lightweight, but somewhat flimsy – based on internet chatter about the Rebel’s lack of durability.

Just like the lightweight Fuecell midsole, the breathable and featherweight upper disappears on the foot during runs. The sizing runs small, so most runners will need to buy a half size larger.

10) Brooks Ghost 14

Unlike many others here, the Brooks Ghost 14 doesn’t have a high-volume midsole. Nor does it have a ride quality with high levels of soft bounciness.

It does, however, have a smooth and cushioned ride that is versatile enough for most run distances – marathons included. The Ghost comes with an upper to match too – it fits securely, comfortably, and true to size.

The Brooks Ghost 14 in a marathon.

The Brooks Ghost 14 in a marathon – on the bottom right corner.

The Ghost 14 has a single-density midsole rather than a dual-density design (with a separate crash pad) that the Ghost 12 and earlier had. As a result, the ride soft is smooth, and has the cushioning comfort desirable for high-mileage runs.

Also see: The Brooks Glycerin 19.

Do you own any of these shoes? Improve this review by sharing your insights – submit a review here.

Other reviews and guides