At the time of writing this guide, Saucony is the model running shoe company. A birds-eye view of its assortment shows you that the brand offers something for everyone.
Are you looking for a road-racer? There are a couple of good ones. Cross country and track spikes? Sure. How about a cushioned trainer? Take your pick. Low drop shoes? Plenty. And if you want a medially-posted support shoe, there’s no dearth of those either.
Saucony maintains a fine balance between style and performance. Their running shoes do not look stodgy; Saucony makes good use of materials and clean visual lines to make their products appealing.
They have a reliable cushioning system too. The Everun foam proved to be a worthy successor to the Powergrid foam platform, and the recently launched Pwrrun+ replaces Everun.
Pwrrun+ is made of e-TPU, the same base compound as the adidas Boost. Everun was e-TPU as well, except that Pwrrun is softer, lighter and more cushioned due to a lower density.
But for now, Saucony Everun is what you’ll see on most of their models. Only the Triumph 17 has a midsole made of the new foam; the switch-over will happen gradually through 2020.
We like the judicious manner in which Saucony uses Everun. On lighter models, Everun is used only as a secondary insole (aka the Topsole) over an EVA midsole. This arrangement provides top-layer responsiveness without incurring a weight penalty.
At the same time, full-length Everun is used where it is relevant. The Hurricane ISO 5 is Saucony’s premium support shoe so it has a full-length Everun midsole. The Freedom and Liberty ISO use a lower-profile midsole so you get the complete Everun experience minus the bulk.
Product messaging is an area where Saucony scores well. Shoe series like the Triumph, Ride, Guide, and the Kinvara have consistently been a part of Saucony’s line. The published heel drops have also remained constant – 8 mm for the regular trainers, 4 mm for the Kinvara and so forth.
It’s unrealistic to expect the Triumph 17 to be anything like the Triumph 11. Regardless, Saucony tries its best to interpret the shoe within the context of the modern shoe industry. Not all updates are improvements; the frequent update cadence leads to an ebb and flow where not all new features hit a home run.
The ISOFIT upper is a good example. Beginning with the first iteration, the strap-based upper has struggled to find the sweet spot between perfect fit and the right use of layering. ISOFIT works better on simpler upper designs such as the Freedom and Switchback ISO where the materials used are thinner.
Also, ISOFIT is retrofitted in shoes where it has no business being. Look no further than the new Peregrine.
The Peregrine 6 and 7 were great; the 8’s upper was average. The Peregrine adopts a standard ISOFIT template, thus achieving the opposite effect – which is not securing the foot as well as the 7 did. Otherwise, the grip and ride are excellent – so the new Peregrine wastes its potential by using ISOFIT.
The ISOFIT concept isn’t an issue per se; its execution is. Many brands use strap-based midfoot panels which add value instead of being a distraction.
Thankfully, the next generation of Saucony running shoes will not have ISOFIT. The Triumph 17 and Guide 13 were launched on November 1st; both ditch the ISOFIT system for a better fitting upper. Good.
Saucony’s consistency with its product nomenclature reflects in this buyer’s guide.
While most of the shoes have familiar names – they aren’t necessarily the same shoes from years ago. Some shoes have new midsoles, and most now come with Saucony’s one-trick pony – the hit or miss ISOFIT upper.
1) Cushioned Neutral: Saucony Ride ISO 2
If you’re asked to name five popular neutral running shoes, you’re likely to mention the Ride ISO 2. The Ride is for Saucony what the Ghost is for Brooks or the Pegasus for Nike. The Ride is a versatile, do-it-all neutral trainer for runners of all classes.
The Ride ISO 2 has a single-density EVA foam midsole which delivers a cushioned and efficient ride. Saucony hasn’t gone overboard with the softness; the ride has a tinge of firmness which is good when you’re trying to build up speed.
The ISOFIT upper is softer than the older Ride versions and requires no break-in period. The upper has a true-to-size profile. The Ride ISO is an excellent alternative to the Triumph if the latter’s softer ride doesn’t cut it for you.
2) Max cushioned Neutral: Saucony Triumph 17
We haven’t published a review of the Saucony Triumph 17 yet. When we do, we’ll describe the new Triumph as ‘Brooks Glycerin meets adidas Boost’. In other words, the plush upper feels a little Brooks-ey and the ride feels similar to the adidas Boost. Similar, not identical though – there are a few things that Saucony does differently.
But first, the basics. Saucony drops the ISO from the Triumph’s name, and that’s because the upper longer comes with the strappy midfoot. Good riddance, we say.
The new upper combines regular eyelets with a soft mesh and lining for a comfortable and distraction-free interior experience. The completely redesigned midsole is the standout feature of the T-17. The foam is still e-TPU but much lighter than the denser Everun used on the previous model.
The midsole is directly connected to the upper without a rim; there’s just an insole over it. The resulting ride has a soft, deep cushioning – the kind that makes long runs comfortable and enjoyable. As long as you don’t have speed miles planned, the Triumph 17 is an excellent daily trainer.
The durable crystal rubber outsole is thin and perforated so it works together with the midsole without adding stiffness.
3) Cushioned Neutral: Saucony Freedom ISO 2
The Freedom was Saucony’s first shoe to feature a full-length Everun midsole. The 4 mm drop midsole has a cushioned and responsive ride, and the clear rubber outsole is very durable.
The Freedom’s lightweight (9-ounce) build quality makes it suitable for fast training runs, and its cushioned midsole makes it a versatile daily trainer. If you want the complete Everun experience without the baggage of the Triumph, then put the Freedom ISO 2 on your list.
Also see: The Liberty ISO 2.
4) Lightweight Neutral: Saucony Kinvara 10
Most people will not even remember how the early Kinvara’s looked or felt like. Over the years, the Kinvara design has followed a bell curve of sorts. It started as a firm lightweight neutral trainer with a race-shoe like upper. Then it became this over-engineered blob of softness with Pro-lock and what not.
The Kinvara 10 is a homage to its roots. The upper reverts back to a minimal construction – there’s no Prolock making the upper feel bulky. The mesh is lightweight, breathable, and the upper fits extremely well and true to size.
The ride is cushioned and slightly responsive – we have to remember that the earlier Kinvaras had a heel-only Powergrid insert. All recent Kinvaras use a full-length Everun Topsole which turns the ride softer. There’s little anyone can do about it – it is unrealistic to expect the same ride as the Kinvaras 1-3.
The changes aside, it’s hard to beat the Kinvara 10 when it comes to a low-drop, sub 8-ounce cushioned trainer. There’re simply not many of those around.
5) Budget Neutral: Saucony Cohesion 12
We say this with absolute confidence – of all the shoes sold by the top-ten athletic footwear brands, the $60 Cohesion delivers the most value for money.
This budget neutral trainer fits well, and the materials do not feel cheap. The injection-molded EVA midsole keeps the shoe under 10 ounces while delivering a cushioned and supportive ride.
Also see: The Cohesion TR 12 – a rugged, off-road doppelganger.
6) Lightweight racer: Saucony Type A9
The Type A9 is one level more cushioned than a full-blown racing flat. At an MSRP of $100, the A9 is excellent value. The lightweight upper fits and feels great, and the resilient midsole provides a fast and cushioned ride.
Combine the minimal upper and the 4 mm drop midsole, and you have the 6-ounce Type A9. An absolute must-have if you want a Saucony shoe for fast training runs or races.
7) Cushioned max-stability: Saucony Redeemer ISO 2
There’s a max stability shoe in most brands. For Saucony, that shoe happens to be the Redeemer ISO 2. Cushioning and support are delivered by a humongous midsole with an ultra-wide outsole footprint.
If want a medial-post, the Redeemer gives you that and then some. A hard foam wedge makes the inner midsole a lot firmer without being conspicuous during runs. The plastic heel frame on the upper acts as an extension of the medial post.
The Redeemer has a super cushy removable insole which takes the edge off the firm midsole. If you want to pop in an aftermarket Orthoses, the Redeemer ISO 2 is the shoe which will take it.
8) Cushioned mild-support: Saucony Guide 13
Just like the Triumph, the Guide ditches the ISO nomenclature by switching to a new upper design.
And that’s not the only change to Saucony’s popular stability shoe; a firmer medial post no longer exists. Instead, the Guide 13 draws inspiration from the Liberty ISO by using a plastic stabilizer affixed to the lower midsole.
So what you get from the Guide 13 is a neutral yet firm ride experience, the kind that works for daily workouts. It will be interesting to see what the new Ride and Hurricane will bring.
9) Mild-support racer: Saucony Fastwitch 9
The Fastwitch 9’s upper and midsole is redesigned from the ground up. The new Fastwitch is a better Fastwitch; the extremely lightweight upper has a conforming fit and breathes well.
The midsole is all business, relying on a standard EVA configuration and no Everun. This gives the shoe excellent ground feel and economy. There’s a medial post but like the New Balance 1500, but it is barely noticeable. The outsole uses the sticky Pwrtrac rubber compound, the same material used in most Saucony trail running shoes.
Saucony charges $10 more for the new Fastwitch but it is still a good buy.
10) Trail running: Saucony Peregrine ISO
The Peregrine is on this guide, but with a caveat. There is no question that the ISO version has a great PwrTrac outsole and midsole. A densely populated colony of rubber lugs provide off-road traction in abundance. Above it, the EVA midsole and Everun layer provide cushioning over uneven running surfaces.
As we said, the ISOFIT execution on the Peregrine could have been a lot better. Saucony simply transplanted their road design on to a trail running shoe.
Instead, they could have looked to the Salomon S/Lab Ultra’s upper for inspiration. Much like the ISOFIT, the S/Lab uses dual straps and speed loops with much better results. We understand that the Salomon shoe is 50% more expensive but there’s definitely some inspiration there for Saucony to tap into.
Even Saucony’s own Switchback ISO has a better upper design. The reason why we recommend the Peregrine over the Switchback because the latter is a soft-roader – the forefoot isn’t as well protected as the Peregrine. But if your runs involve grass and dry trails without pointy obstacles, then the Switchback ISO is an excellent choice.
To sum up – the Peregrine ISO is a decent trail shoe at the price, but it is less serious compared to the Peregrine 6 and 7.